The mythos of nazi/fascism is quite easy to simplify :
We (religion/ethnic group/nationality) are intrasequely better than (the out-group: French/lybians/Serbs/Anglo-Saxon/muslims/whatever) and the reason why they (are living better/are richer/are more powerful) is because we have traitors in our midst (jews/socialists/communists/anarchists/tzigan/liberals/whatever) who work against us.
If you do not have the second part, you will have a more standard cesarism (that can be left-wing too, like leninism or early trotskism). A recent example in my country would be Gaullism, in a way.
Are they nazi, or 'just' cesarists (with even more nationalism on top) ? Do you know who their internal enemy is? It should be designated and different from their actual foreign enemy. Example : in France, the far-right foreign enemies are muslims, but the traitors/internal ennemies are left-wingers/academia. If they do not design 'traitors', I wouldn't classify them far-right (because they wouldn't be).
We (religion/ethnic group/nationality) are intrasequely better than (the out-group: French/lybians/Serbs/Anglo-Saxon/muslims/whatever) and the reason why they (are living better/are richer/are more powerful) is because we have traitors in our midst (jews/socialists/communists/anarchists/tzigan/liberals/whatever) who work against us.
If you do not have the second part, you will have a more standard cesarism (that can be left-wing too, like leninism or early trotskism). A recent example in my country would be Gaullism, in a way.
Are they nazi, or 'just' cesarists (with even more nationalism on top) ? Do you know who their internal enemy is? It should be designated and different from their actual foreign enemy. Example : in France, the far-right foreign enemies are muslims, but the traitors/internal ennemies are left-wingers/academia. If they do not design 'traitors', I wouldn't classify them far-right (because they wouldn't be).