Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The opposite of the "design by committee" method that resulted in the F-35 disaster. A plane so bad in every imaginable way it was put (and kept) in production purely and reluctantly as a jobs program.


Well when they request 5-6 variants and one is very different, things happen. Idk if it’s as bad as the Bradley fighting vehicle in production.

There was one huge order over many years that cause the continuous production. This doesn’t include variants sold to several other nations.

For the I series: “A senior IAF official said that the F-35's stealth may be partly overcome within 10 years despite a 30 to 40-year service life, thus Israel's insistence on using their own electronic warfare systems”.

The Accidents and notable incidents is an interesting read on https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II


Is it bad in _every_ way, though?

I do understand it would lose every time to an F-16 in a dogfight, but it would have vaporised that F-16 long before visual range.

Afaics it has more operational capability than the previous generation of warplanes, in ways that matter to military planners.


And to maintain control over European air forces.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: