By that measure, gif.ski is 78% better than itself!
With lossy compression it's always possible to make files smaller, and smaller, and smaller. Comparisons of lossy encoders without controlling for quality lead to such absurd results. See https://kornel.ski/en/faircomparison
I can run:
and it reduces the same file by 65%. With -Q20 it can be 78% smaller: https://gif.ski/jazz-ultra-small.gifBy that measure, gif.ski is 78% better than itself!
With lossy compression it's always possible to make files smaller, and smaller, and smaller. Comparisons of lossy encoders without controlling for quality lead to such absurd results. See https://kornel.ski/en/faircomparison