Particularly for this specific type of issue so long as the response is still trained to be in the form "There is a high chance this information is wrong in a way that will kill you if you try to eat it but it looks like..." then I don't see "There is a high chance this information is wrong in a way that will kill you if you try to eat it so I can't respond..." as being a better response. I.e. the value in this example comes not from complete censorship but from training on the situation being risky, not from me deciding what information is too unsafe for you to know.