The great thing about Bayesian statistics is that it's subjective. You don't have to be in the subjectivist school. You can choose your own interpretation based on your (subjective) judgment.
I think this is a strength of Bayesianism. Any statistical work is infused with the subjective judgement of individual humans. I think it is more objective to not shy away from this immutable fact.
Of course. The best approach for a particular problem depends on your best judgment.
I guess that means I'm in the pragmatist school in this article's nomenclature (I'm a big fan of Gelman and all the other stats folks there), but what one thinks is pragmatic is also subjective.
I think this is a strength of Bayesianism. Any statistical work is infused with the subjective judgement of individual humans. I think it is more objective to not shy away from this immutable fact.