I'm still not sure I've fully understood you, but I think you're probably making some assumptions about the business model around this and how it would be deployed, whereas the blog post was just about the technical architecture.

I agree that it's easier for businesses to buy in a solution than try to develop something in-house. The intention is certainly not that commercial users of this operating system would need to write their own code. It is just one part of a wider commercial solution.

Perhaps that's my fault for sharing this outside of the context of the problems it is intended to solve and the wider business model around it.

Regardless, I appreciate you taking the time to respond.