Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I’ll speak only for iOS since that’s what I’m most familiar with.

The important thing to realise is that no one wanted alternative stores. Not really. What everyone wanted was for the existing store to not be stressful oppressive garbage. If Apple didn’t have draconian rules where they charge too high margins and repeatedly reject apps for stupid petty reasons, they wouldn’t have found themselves in this situation. The other big players would even likely accept having to sell via in-app purchases (offering better consistent protection to consumers) if Apple weren’t egregiously eating into their margins.

Don’t take my word for it, we have (now public) internal emails where Apple executives discuss these very issues and question how long they could keep it up.

Alternative stores were the next best thing. When it became clear that Apple wouldn’t fix their behaviour, the only choice was to fight for legislation where they don’t have as much of a say. Make no mistake, they (Tim Cook in particular) brought it on themselves.

As to your specific questions:

1. App discoverability has been unusable for years. The App Store is the last place where I look for apps.

2. The App Store is already filled with privacy-violating apps and scams. Apple ensures jack shit. Scammers don’t need to create fake stores, they are already doing pretty well for themselves in the main store selling flashlight apps with expensive weekly subscriptions.

Is this situation worse for non-technical users? Maybe. Right now there are big scary warning when trying to add third-party stores, and that does make some sense. But Apple will have to get off their ass and make better privacy protections at the OS level.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: