Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, basic set theory: not every restriction is a fundamental restriction.


Elaborate?


I said NOT(rule in "fundamental restrictions") AND (rule is XXX). You showed (XXX in "restrictions"). It would have been sufficient to prove my statement false if "fundamental restrictions" === "restrictions", but it is not.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: