> Its neutrons are antineutrons made of a positron and antiproton.
Neutrons are made of on up quarks and two down quark (and a lot of gluons).
Antineutrons are made of on up antiquarks and two down antiquark (and a lot of gluons).
There are no (anti)protons or (anti)electrons inside (anti)neutrons.
> Of course, antimatter has opposite electrical attraction.
Nitpicking: attraction -> charge
> If an antimatter plastic comb attracts antimatter styrofoam crumbs, those crumbs will be repelled by the matter plastic comb (luckily for them).
IIRC the charge in the comb induces a charge in the crumbs. If the charge of the comb is X, the -X charges move closer to the comb, and the X charges move far away. And that those displaced charges create a dipole that is attracted to the comb.
So I think the anti-comb would attract the normal-crumbs and create a huge explossion.
Neutrons are made of on up quarks and two down quark (and a lot of gluons).
Antineutrons are made of on up antiquarks and two down antiquark (and a lot of gluons).
There are no (anti)protons or (anti)electrons inside (anti)neutrons.
> Of course, antimatter has opposite electrical attraction.
Nitpicking: attraction -> charge
> If an antimatter plastic comb attracts antimatter styrofoam crumbs, those crumbs will be repelled by the matter plastic comb (luckily for them).
IIRC the charge in the comb induces a charge in the crumbs. If the charge of the comb is X, the -X charges move closer to the comb, and the X charges move far away. And that those displaced charges create a dipole that is attracted to the comb.
So I think the anti-comb would attract the normal-crumbs and create a huge explossion.