Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

For the unfamiliar, Betteridge’s Law of Headlines[1]:

"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'"

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines



Unfortunately, that law doesn't stand up to scrutiny. I've read several stories today alone where the question in the headline cannot be answered accurately with a simple "no", not that this headline is one of them.


The unfamiliar? This article is referenced on HN at least once a week now


And for a good reason. I find the noise to signal ratio of these articles relatively high and I think many would like to see less of them.


Will HN ever stop upvoting linkbait, references to Betteridge’s Law, or self-referential jokes?


I knew about the law, but I didn't know its name!


Headline:

"Perhaps Betteridge's Law of Headlines is always true?"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: