Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The combination of the most probable tokens doesn't necessarily have to be in the training set, thus creating something completely novel.


If you shuffle a deck of cards, you likely have a novel sequence of cards. I'm not sure how that is relevant?


I was responding to this "merely produces syntactically likely combinations of the training data".


That is called a hallucination.


Yes, like the Jacobian counterexample.


That LLM was attached to a Python and MATLAB evaluator. It generated plausible things to feed into a real computer.


Weird take as a lot of things humans invent and test are done in similar ways.


Only if it's incorrect.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: