> but they're very frequent.

Yet you state their frequency as some sort of statistical fact. Your anecdotal experience doesn't make it any more or less true.

and you are refuting with even less justification. I told you how to check for yourself if you actually cared about veracity. Best of luck trying to get funding to publish something academic anti-CCP though, but I'd love it if you did. Also this is just a conversation, not an academic debate

> I told you how to check for yourself if you actually cared about veracity.

Which means nothing. You still dont get my point.

> Also this is just a conversation, not an academic debate

It can be both.