Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Something like this sketch work for you?

peer(X, 0) :- founding_peer(X).

electorate(T, count<Y>) :- peer(Y, T).

support(X, T, count<Y>) :- candidate(X), peer(Y, T), recognizes(Y, X, T+1).

peer(X, T+1) :- support(X, T, Votes), electorate(T, Total), 2 * Votes > Total.



Still waiting for a definition. People giving nonsense reviews is a feature of the peer review system though, yes.


I want to ensure your PhD is actually from somebody who is acknowledged in the system of peers I bought into, before I want to risk wasting more of my time defining and explain while guessing at your ability to parse and understand them.


Or you could just give me a sensible definition.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: