Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The headline cracks me up. Has the implication that if you think you're terrible at it, you might be good.

And computer analogies are terrible here. My body is ridiculously good at multitasking in ways that I have learned through years of doing over and over. I never have to think about how to breath and walk, walk and talk, etc. Oddly, in some respects I'm terrible at talking and typing. Clearly something is going on with a shared resource. (Off topic, but there is a great Feynman video talking about the differences in how some people count in their heads leading to different people being able to do other things at the same time.)

None of this is to say I'm trying to argue for texting while driving. But to think that it is simply a matter of multitasking without some degree of training being involved seems disingenuous. When I first learned standard transmission, talking while driving was difficult to consider. Now, I can eat a taco in mild traffic.



"Has the implication that if you think you're terrible at it, you might be good."

Which is often the case. When you understanding something well enough to be good at it, you also understand the limitations of your knowledge, and are more likely to rate yourself poorly as a result.


Actually, I think the Feynman thing is perfectly on topic. There are some things that you can multitask, but it's different for different people.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: