Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's questionable [1] how much Hillary Clinton had to do with that order and I'm not sure "steal the DNA" is a fair characterization. Also, that order had its roots at least as far back as 2001.

[1] http://www.nationaljournal.com/whitehouse/hillary-clinton-di...



I'm not sure "steal the DNA" is a fair characterization.

Your National Journal link describes an order "to collect the 'biometric data'... including DNA". What's unfair about this characterization?


It's out of context. It suggests the memo is primarily about "stealing DNA" when, in fact, the letters "DNA" do not appear in it: http://www.theguardian.com/world/us-embassy-cables-documents...


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/nov/28/us-embassy-cabl...

f3, DNA, enter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: