Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If you rely on VirtualBox, I would recommend to hold off on upgrading until you are sure that it will not break your workflow.

The big releases tend to have a way of introducing bugs, that although get fixed, can wreck your day if you depend on it.



I just upgraded to 4.3 (Win7 host, Sandy Bridge Core i7 processor), and VirtualBox is now complaining that I've got more virtual cores (4) assigned to my guest than I have physical cores (2) on my host.

While this is true, this wasn't an issue with 4.2. It still lets me run it, but it's not happy about it.

EDIT: Further investigation shows that VirtualBox docs have always said this was a bad thing to do, but didn't used to throw up a warning when you did it anyways.


> ... but didn't used to throw up a warning when you did it anyways.

This is mentioned in the changelog, FWIW.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: