Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Too bad they aren't interested in assisting the poor. This could have been a godsend. The market their price targets will likely show little interest. They like and can afford food.


That is actual one of the creator's goals:

“I’d like this to be something that is like coffee — a commodity something that’s available everywhere. Maybe a utility like water and power. Something that is ubiquitous and easy to consume,” he said. “I’d like to see it in grocery and convenience stores soon.” ( http://techcrunch.com/2013/08/01/soylent-1m-preorders/ )

You have to keep in mind this is an early adopter, hot-off-the-manufacturing-line, hey-look-this-might-work version. Give it time to grow, mature, and let economies of scale kick in.


Every product needs to assist the poor or it's immoral?


where did the commenter say it was immoral?


"Could have been a godsend" -> "It's not a godsend" -> "It's not something from god" -> "It's not good" -> "It's bad" -> "It's immoral"


Isn't there already Plumpy'nut for that?


I'm skeptical that a packaged product like soylent would be able to compete in price with regular food. Their market, at least for now is going to be a) people who want a strict diet and b) people who would rather eat a milk shake than cook normal food.


They can (and probably will) help the poor once they scale up their production and drive the marginal production cost down.

Low cost hinges on scaling up (and hopefully also being less strict about pseudo-"hypo-allergenic" properties).


Have they published a bulk cost breakdown? From what I've read the price seems too high but I'd like to see the data.

It's impact on poverty world wide could be like the potato was to Europe and the Islands. On second thought...


They have (somewhere), but even more interesting is that they are kind of treating this in a sort of open source manner. They either plan to (or already have) publish the recipe. It's not going to be a trade secret, and they expect competition. The kickstarter they did basically gives them enough funds to establish supply lines and produce a viable product. Any real competition would have to jump through similar hoops, and that takes time. One of their goals is to make the product ubiquitous ('like coffee'), so as long as they're making money, they don't care if they're even the market leader. Of course, for the short term, they will be.

To that end, Soylent has a DIY section where people have contributed recipes so you can make soylent yourself, often with a button to add all the ingredients into your amazon cart.

http://diy.soylent.me/wiki/why-diy-soylent

And you can view the recipes by my favorite or most complete: http://diy.soylent.me/recipes?pctComplete=0.99&sort=favorite...

The thing to remember that when you DIY, you're buying the ingredients in bulk and it seems expensive. Take for example the [QuidNYC's Superfood for him](http://diy.soylent.me/recipes/quidnycs-superfood-for-him) which will cost you $437 up front, but gives you an ~80 day supply, so it really comes down to $5.50/day. Also, if you compare that to the Soylent campaign prices, it's $255 for a 1 month supply, or $130 for a 2 week supply. There's no real "trial size" at this point, so it's rather difficult to try a bunch of recipes and see what you like.

Also, not all recipes are created equal: http://diy.soylent.me/recipes/hungry-hobo-i-cant-believe-its...


Where did they say they are not interested in assisting the poor?


At about $9/day, it's still too expensive for a lot of poor people. You can eat rice and beans for $1 a day, or a healthy variety of food for $5-6/day (though requiring more time to prepare obviously)


Their price tag is not an indicative on whether they're interested in helping poor people or not.


Uh, isn't that one of their primary objectives?


Explain to me what's preventing this from being a godsend in a few years, when the economies of scale start to line up.

Yours is the 3rd comment that says almost identically the same thing. Are you guys in on this bashing together?


Yeah, it's Big Food paying all of these nasty commenters to bash Soylent because it's so disruptive. /s




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: