Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This article was of course a distilled version of a much longer conversation. The uneven equity split that causes problems is usually along the lines of 75% vs. 25%-- or worse, when one founder gets 10% or less. We see this happen quite often (and advise against it if we're not too late). The founder with 10% often becomes resentful and doesn't feel properly incentivized when he/she is working just as hard as the founder with 85%. A startup is so much about execution-- usually over a long period of time that the argument of "it was my idea" isn't very compelling. (60/40 is usually totally reasonable though, especially in a situation like yours.)


Should the majority equity holder be the "clear leader" who is the final decision maker?




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: