> I wish the author had not omitted this crucial paragraph in the announcement he quotes:
I did not quote this announcement, only linked to it.
If this is intended to be prototype code, it should not be enabled by default, and certainly shouldn't be printing inaccurate messages to users in a 1.0 product.
Also, the referenced warning goes to the daemon log, and doesn't appear to ever be triggered.
> I wish the author had not omitted this crucial paragraph in the announcement he quotes:
I did not quote this announcement, only linked to it.
If this is intended to be prototype code, it should not be enabled by default, and certainly shouldn't be printing inaccurate messages to users in a 1.0 product.
Also, the referenced warning goes to the daemon log, and doesn't appear to ever be triggered.