Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
itake
on April 7, 2020
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
A new weapon in arbitration: sheer volume
Many companies require you sign a contracting to use their service (or in this case to be employed by them) that says you agree to binding arbitration
sfifs
on April 7, 2020
[–]
No longer binding if the company breachs the arbitration clause. They're going to be sued if the issue is real.
anonymousab
on April 7, 2020
|
parent
[–]
It seems simple enough for a binding arbitration clause to simply require the plaintiff to pay, and to tack on additional clauses to indemnify the corporate party.
Nextgrid
on April 7, 2020
|
root
|
parent
|
next
[–]
I would assume that these scum companies would’ve already done so long ago if this was possible.
ClumsyPilot
on April 7, 2020
|
root
|
parent
|
prev
[–]
As much as they might dream of becoming legally invulnerable, I think even in US thats illegal.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search: